Your provider network is the clinical backbone of your telehealth business. It determines which states you can serve, how fast patients get seen, what conditions you can treat, and how much your cost of care eats into margin. Choose well and your operations scale smoothly. Choose poorly and you're stuck in a months-long migration while patients churn.
Four names dominate the white-label telehealth provider network space in 2026: OpenLoop, Wizlo, MD Integrations (MDI), and Beluga Health. Each takes a meaningfully different approach. This post is a practical, experience-based comparison, not a feature matrix copy-pasted from marketing pages.
What Does a Provider Network Actually Do?
Before comparing, it's worth clarifying what we mean by 'provider network' in a telehealth context. These companies supply licensed clinicians (physicians, NPs, PAs) who see your patients under your brand. The provider network handles credentialing, licensing, scheduling, and clinical oversight so you don't have to build a medical practice from scratch.
Most white-label provider networks offer some combination of: nationwide clinician coverage (all 50 states), pre-built clinical protocols for common verticals (GLP-1, TRT, mental health), e-prescribing and pharmacy fulfillment routing, and integration APIs for connecting to your patient-facing systems.
OpenLoop Health
OpenLoop is the largest and most established white-label clinical infrastructure provider. They offer full-stack support: clinician staffing, a technology platform, and increasingly, payer coverage for reimbursable visits.
Strengths
- Scale and coverage: All 50 states, large clinician network, proven at high volume. If you're processing thousands of patients per month, OpenLoop can handle it.
- Vertical breadth: GLP-1, TRT, HRT, longevity, urgent care, dermatology, mental health. They support more clinical categories than any competitor.
- Payer coverage: Increasingly supporting insurance-reimbursable visits, which opens up business models beyond cash-pay DTC.
- API-first integration: Clean APIs for embedding clinical workflows into your own patient experience.
Considerations
- Higher cost per visit than smaller networks; you're paying for scale and reliability
- Onboarding and custom workflow setup can take longer than smaller, more nimble providers
- Best suited for brands that are past early-stage validation and scaling patient volume
Wizlo
Wizlo positions itself as an all-in-one platform rather than just a provider network. Their offering includes EMR, patient portals, intake workflows, pharmacy fulfillment, payments, and a white-label patient-facing experience, all bundled together.
Strengths
- All-in-one bundling: If you want a single vendor for clinical, EMR, portal, and fulfillment, Wizlo offers everything under one roof.
- Pre-built workflows: Ready-to-go protocols for GLP-1, wellness, TRT/HRT that can launch in weeks rather than months.
- Lab integration: Direct connections to Labcorp, Quest, and Tasso at-home kits plus 300+ wearable devices.
- All 50 states: Full nationwide coverage with their provider network.
Considerations
- The all-in-one model means deeper lock-in; migrating away from Wizlo means replacing multiple systems at once
- Less flexibility if you want to use your own portal, checkout, or intake tooling alongside their network
- Best fit for operators who want to outsource as much of the tech stack as possible
MD Integrations (MDI)
MDI takes a physician-led approach to white-label telehealth. Founded and run by doctors, they emphasize clinical quality and compliance while providing API-first integration for brands that want to build their own patient experience.
Strengths
- Clinical-first philosophy: Built by physicians, which shows in protocol quality and compliance rigor.
- API-driven integration: Designed for brands that want to own the patient experience while outsourcing clinical delivery.
- Nationwide coverage: Provider network across all 50 states.
- Flexibility: Works well with brands that have their own portal, checkout, and intake systems and just need the clinical layer.
Considerations
- Less patient-facing tooling than Wizlo; you'll need your own portal, checkout, and intake
- Smaller scale than OpenLoop, which may matter at very high volumes
- Best for brands that want clinical quality and API flexibility over turnkey solutions
Beluga Health
Beluga Health offers white-label telemedicine connecting patients to physicians in all 50 states. Their focus is on simplicity and speed: getting brands from zero to live telehealth operations as quickly as possible.
Strengths
- Speed to launch: One of the fastest networks to get started with. Minimal setup friction for brands that want to test quickly.
- Simplicity: Less complex than OpenLoop or Wizlo, which is a feature if you want straightforward provider access without enterprise overhead.
- All 50 states: Full coverage for nationwide DTC telehealth.
- Cost-effective: Competitive per-visit pricing for brands watching their unit economics closely.
Considerations
- Fewer built-in integrations compared to larger platforms
- Less vertical specialization; protocols may need more customization for specific use cases
- Best for early-stage brands validating product-market fit or running lean operations
How to Choose: A Decision Framework
The right provider network depends on your stage, volume, and how much of the tech stack you want to own versus outsource. Here's how we advise operators to think about it:
- Scaling fast with high volume? → OpenLoop. Their infrastructure handles the most traffic with the most clinical breadth.
- Want an all-in-one platform? → Wizlo. Minimizes vendor management at the cost of flexibility.
- Own your patient experience, outsource clinical? → MDI. Best API-first approach for brands with existing tech.
- Early-stage, testing quickly? → Beluga. Fastest launch with the leanest cost structure.
Why Modularity Matters for Provider Network Flexibility
We've seen telehealth companies delay switching provider networks for 6-12 months because their patient portal, checkout, and intake were all built on top of the network's proprietary platform. That coupling is the real lock-in, not the clinical relationship.
The operators who move fastest keep their patient-facing layer (checkout, portal, website) independent from their clinical layer (provider network). When you structure it this way, a provider network switch becomes a backend integration change rather than a front-end rebuild.
Build your patient experience independently
Thimble Hub's checkout, portal, and website products integrate with any provider network: OpenLoop, Wizlo, MDI, Beluga, or your own in-house team. No lock-in.
Explore the stack →The Bottom Line
All four networks can get you to market with nationwide telehealth. The differences are in scale, bundling, flexibility, and cost. OpenLoop is the enterprise-grade choice. Wizlo is the all-in-one platform. MDI offers physician-led clinical quality with API flexibility. Beluga gets you to market fastest at the lowest cost.
Whatever you choose, protect your optionality by keeping your patient-facing infrastructure modular. The clinical landscape changes fast, and the ability to switch providers without rebuilding your portal and checkout is worth more than any single network relationship.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Can I use multiple provider networks at the same time?
- Yes, and some operators do this for redundancy or to cover different clinical specialties. For example, you might use OpenLoop for GLP-1 and a different network for mental health. The key requirement is that your patient-facing systems can route to multiple backend providers based on program type.
- How long does it take to integrate with a provider network?
- Typical integration takes 2-6 weeks depending on the complexity of your workflows and how API-ready your existing systems are. All-in-one platforms like Wizlo can be faster for initial launch but slower to customize. API-first networks like MDI take longer upfront but offer more flexibility.
- What does a provider network cost per patient?
- Per-visit costs vary significantly based on volume, clinical specialty, and the level of service included. Synchronous video visits cost more than asynchronous consultations. Most networks offer volume discounts. Expect to negotiate pricing based on your projected monthly patient volume.
- What happens if I want to bring clinicians in-house later?
- This is a common growth path. Many brands start with a white-label network and gradually hire clinicians as they scale. If your patient-facing infrastructure is independent from your provider network, this transition is much smoother: your checkout, portal, and patient experience don't need to change.